🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are exploring comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that phones and apps are "taking away our kids' childhood". The policy is expected to be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban is "one of the tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked the legislature to enact a law lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a similar step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised families to block their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a symbolic statement demanding a ban for minors unless guardian approval is provided. While it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a solid foundation," commented the MEP behind the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "based on robust data".

Earlier, momentum built behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. However, the government pledged to further research the issue.

Charities have raised concerns. An organization founded by the family of a teenager who was lost after viewing dangerous platform posts argues that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are safe and fit for young users," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, legislation is primarily happening at the local level due to national stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has signed a law barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a regulation capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced laws mandating adult authorization for minors to open social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from some figures to copy this path, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from these regions, further countries are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, international agencies take a more measured position. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve safety.

As this global debate unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and others show that policymakers around the world are less and less prepared to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.